Should the US use Atomic Weapons against Japan?

Modern history-Q&A

1. Should the US use Atomic Weapons against Japan?

Remember, you are advising President Harry Truman, on how to defeat the Empire of Japan in World War II.

Give specific evidence (events, examples, statistics) why you would support or reject the use of atomic weapons to end the war.

Keep in mind, the date is August 1, 1945.

Any evidence you give must be from something that would be known at the time.

Remember, be accurate and civil. You can lose points if you fail to do either.

Form: Debate

Note: Any act of plagiarism will result in a zero for the assignment and disciplinary action. A second confirmed act of plagiarism will merit removal from the class.

Instructions: It is July 20, 1945. You are a top advisor to President Harry Truman. You have just been informed that the US military has successfully developed two bombs of unimaginable power, and a third is nearly completed.

Scoring: You will be scored on the quality and specificity of the evidence you provide.

Make one statement at a time! You can earn up to five points for each statistic, event, or example that shows why you chose your position.

Step 1, gather evidence (statistics, events, and examples) from your textbook and class lectures. It is your job to gather evidence on the strength and weaknesses of Japan at this time, keeping in mind how long the war has been going on, and the nature of the fighting between the US and the Japanese Empire.

Step 2, analyze the evidence. You are to advise Truman on whether or not to drop the bomb and to give specific evidence why you have reached your conclusion. Keep in mind that it is July 20, 1945. Any evidence you give must be from something that would be known at the time. You have no idea what happens afterward.

Step 3, communicate your findings honestly to yourself and others. Engage in the online debate, as if you were in a room with others advising Truman.

Cover one specific topic for each of your posts, and show sample evidence about that one topic.

The goal here is to try and start several discussions, each one of them specifically addressing a single topic, such as casualties.

Note: You can change your mind during the debate. Keep in mind that the day is July 20, 1945.

You don’t know what happens after that.

2. write a short letter to Mr. President, you are advising President Harry Truman, on how to defeat the Empire of Japan in World War II. Give specific evidence (events, examples, statistics) why you would support or reject the use of atomic weapons to end the war. Keep in mind, the date is August 1, 1945. Any evidence you give must be from something that would be known at the time. Remember, be accurate and civil. You can lose points if you fail to do either.

3. respond to this every three statements make sure to put # front of the answer

1. Mr. President, The problem with dropping the bomb is the possible aftereffects of the explosion. The Japanese could view it as an American weakness and attempt to attack. Additionally, If we drop the bomb it could spark a revolution in the falling patriotism of the Japanese soldiers. I suggest the delay of the bomb drop to see if they give up or not.

2. Mr. President, The use of the atomic Bomb would leave Japan in a state of disaster and fear. The decision of whether we utilize the bomb or not is something that must be considered heavily. Nuking the Japanese would vastly hasten the war’s end. After the Iwo Jima conflict, it is clear that they will not give up easily. Therefore, I urge you to drop the nuke as soon as possible.

3. Mr. President, The decision of dropping any of the bombs developed from the Manhattan Project is a grave one. Please keep in mind the following information regarding the Japanese:

The Japanese are fighting for an Emperor who has them convinced that it is better to die than surrender.
Women and children have been taught how to kill with basic weapons.
Japanese kamikaze pilots could turn planes into guided missiles.
The cost of invasion will be high and risky.
These bombs will wipe out entire cities sending a very strong message to the Japanese that, like them, we are fighting until the end. Using at least one of these bombs would be the most effective way to begin the end, if not completely end the war and not lose any more American lives while doing so. To end this war, I urge you to use weapons.

Image preview for”should the US use Atomic Weapons against Japan?”

Should the US use Atomic Weapons against Japan

APA

920 words

Click the purchase button to get full answer.

Open chat
Hello,
If you need further assistance, please send us a text here